Mennonite Action?

Mennonite Action (MA) Response

We are enjoying the Christmas here while in Bethlehem on the West Bank, Christians are being slaughtered – with our tax dollars.  We bury our heads in the sand.  “I didn’t know”.    Is it a sin if we don’t know?  Or a sin to not want to find out?   If sin can be described as a break in a relationship, then not talking with others may be in the same category.  

Mennonite Action should not become an institution.  They will just ask for money and allow the rest of us to feel OK because we donated.  Praying and singing may give comfort to some, but it will not be enough.  We must push people to make decisions.  We must not only be God’s love but also God’s power.  

The pillars of power described by MA can be misused by authoritarian governments.  This model implies that we can just kick out the support structures and it will collapse.  But we can’t do that.  Why?  I know people in all these support structure organizations – unions, media, police, etc.  We can’t take away their jobs.  We should not destroy the current structures without creating – and actually starting alternative forms of mutual support.  Anabaptists and Amish should be good at that.  Will they take the lead?

Neither will it be enough to form mutual aid societies for our own group.  We must push other groups to do the same.  With the right tools, they too have the ability to talk, think, and solve problems.  It may require a place where people can meet in private and form some opinion before putting it on the table.  (“. . . where two or three are gathered. . . “).  It must also be a place that encourages seeing with new eyes and making new moves.  It must be a place that turns real faith into real action.  

Political demonstrations do not seem to be working fast enough.  Vincent Bevins describes this in “If We Burn.”  It may be that people we call “activists” are not the right people to find a solution, even if they seem indispensable for getting the process started.  We must push others both inside and outside the church.  Push local groups to use their own money to engage outsiders.  

What other things could Mennonite Action do? A few suggestions:

1. Start Anti-War Games.  These can be as varied as we can imagine. (see Greenland below)

2. Find alternative modes of moving useful information, especially when the mainstream media has failed.  Push to create additional high-tech and low-tech communication sources that cannot be shut down by a power outage or censorship.

3. Ask Questions, Force choices – even small ones.  Making choices can be empowering for some people who are never asked to make choices for something outside their own world.  

4. Use of hypothetical situations (“what if . . . “) can help clarify our thinking and avoid nit picking. But then turn it into something real, some action and follow-up.   

5. Go to nearest Synagogue and engage their members in finding a better way out for Israel.  Rejected?  Close off their parking lot.  If they refuse to engage, then put signs “we support Genocide” in their lawn or on their cars.  Force a choice.  Push them to believe that their God is a living God who can change The Story.  They do not have to be slaves to an Old Story.  The world has changed.  The Story of their God can change too.  If God exists anywhere, it is in the relationship and interaction between two human beings.  

6. Find a few AIPAC lobbyists in Congress and, one by one, help them find a new job.   Focus many on a few for 1-2 weeks.  If not successful move on or change tactics.  

7. Create Ten-Two groups in which ten people support (food, rent, insurance) two in their group and free them up to do anything the group wants, including starting other Ten-two groups.  Once started, the group is accountable only to themselves.  Some will fail but others move forward, going beyond mutual aid to finding some purpose for the group.  

8. Use Other Types of Power:

 – [ #1-3 are Guns, Money, Information (Mass Media).  These will not disappear. ]   

 –  #4-10 include Division of Labor; Competition; Processes that include Privacy, Incentive, and Efficiency; Feedback Mechanisms constructed from the outside; Bottlenecks – both physical and social interaction bottlenecks; Focusing on a Few; Change the Target Learner.  

9. We can make communities more secure and stable despite a downturn in the economy if we can push people to talk and solve problems with each other, then do this with other communities.  We must think and plan ahead, not simply react to an authoritarian gang.  

What type of society do we want to emerge?  If we can create real change, there will be real support for MA both in both money and volunteers.  

Transformation Steps – 

Start quick, local debates both inside our church and in the larger community.  Allow some privacy by creating randomly picked teams.  If no one engages, then pick, name, and announce individuals for each team.  If still no engagement, challenge them in public.  Turn over the tables in the temple that allow people to hide.  If still no engagement, move on to someone else.  This is what Mennonite Action – and the rest of us – should be doing. 

Our government may be realizing that taking Venezuela will be harder than previously thought.  So now the Trump administration is setting their sights on Greenland.  Bullies pick on a weaker states.  Find a few people in Greenland (or Venezuela) who are willing to listen.  If nobody answers, then put up a prize and have a competition among small groups.  Keep it off the front page.  Help them find extra, alternative channels of communication to their mainstream media.  Then push them to think about what they themselves – personally – will do when US troops show up in their country.  Only then is it time to broadcast potential future actions to everyone, including current government leaders.  This is a type of anti-war game. It can continue to remain non-violent, even if the other side does not.  It must push people and government officials to make decisions.  Sticking our heads in the sand will not get us there.  

Changing the Story for Israel

Goliath got up on the wrong side of bed.  It would be a difficult day for him.  People of the Jewish faith must thank him for doing it however, since it was Goliath who provided the reason that a shepherd boy David would rise to become King.  It was not surprising that David had skill with his slingshot, having practiced daily to keep the wolves away from the sheep.  He could hit a tin can at 50 paces – or something like that. 

This is a cherished story of Judaism, yet one can imagine another chapter to the story.  Goliath, whose first name was Garth, had a younger sister Billie who had seen the whole incident.  Billie made note of the fact that Garth had not worn is helmet like his mother told him.  Billie was not going to make the same mistake.  Sure enough, on the second meeting with David, Billie was victorious and went on to become Queen of the Philistines. 

Stories can certainly be inspirational, but to be really useful they must touch reality at some point.  Fast forward to Israel today where the Iron Dome is said to keep out all the missiles. . . except they don’t.  The story of the Iron Dome has holes in it, allowing both Iran and Yemen to fire missiles into Israel. This is a problem. Once the enemy has equal or superior military force, the story must change if Israel is to survive. It does not have to be a new Story, but it must change directions and follow a new path. 

Up to this point, Israel’s solution is to “kill the enemy first” before they have a chance to strike, following a strategy conceived by the early Zionist leader Ze’ev Jabotinsky.   That might have worked during the time of Abraham and Isaac, but that was long ago.  At that time, a “nation” was a group of related tribes with no geographic boundaries.  The earth was flat and one might see only 50 miles from the top of the nearby mountain. This was their story, and it remains precious, but will it guide us today?  

We must now think not only about who the enemy is, but about who we are.  Are we an older sibling – or are we really an enemy?  This self-concept can make a difference.  Is the God we worship the God of all – or only a God for us?

Then how does one change a story?  It is not a group effort except maybe a consensus to trim a bit here and there like a hairdresser might do. It should grow from a seed from ideas of one or two people, then be compared with another story, then chosen by a third party judge who makes a “decision” (meaning “cut off”), and the process repeated. 

What can Christians do about the war in Gaza?  Christians know both the stories of Abraham and the current direction of Israel.  And we like stories.  We can help to start a new story or at least a change in the current story, and with just a few people, re-iterate the process, invite some outsiders, maybe some Jews, maybe Muslims or others. They can participate but cannot take over the process. If those invited refuse, then we develop the Story alone.  Others may eventually join in to create a new pathway ahead.